On Sunday, June 7th a group of anarcha-feminists took the stage at the Anarchist Conference 09 to protest about sexist oppression within the movement. They projected a film and read out a statement, both of which you can find below.

Their actions went on to provoke a huge response – with comments ranging from undiluted misogyny to militant solidarity.

The misogyny provided more examples of the sexism we all battle with when we try and make our voices heard. Such attitudes make the prospect of fighting back more intimidating, but also increasingly urgent.

From the audience:

“Are you going to do a sexy dance for us?”.

And online:

“A wrote:
Bear, was there any hotties present

“B wrote:
a few. one of the radical feminists who disrupted it, and who I know
looked really cute in black hoodie.”

These comments are undeniably sexist, but hierarchical social relations
cannot be reduced to personal insults or behaviour. Sexism thrives upon subtle and intangible processes which make gender domination and exploitation endemic.

Those responses to the action which asked, ‘why did you take the mic from a woman?’, ‘why did you not include the woman at Speakers’ Corner?’, ‘why did you criticise a poster designed by a woman?’ were missing the point. For any focus we put on the numerical dominance of men is only a detail within our broader perspective on the institutionalised power arrangements reproduced and upheld by patriarchy. These can continue to operate in situations where a woman is taking the lead.

So the attempts in our film and text to expose and delegitimate prescribed gender roles must be seen within our larger analysis of gender oppression.

We are not fighting a battle between men and women, but one against the divisive gender labels that people remain obstinately attached to.
Consequently, we reject the conception of a binary male-female
relationship, in which sexist relations are always characterised by a male oppressor acting upon a female victim. We call for a rejection of liberal feminism’s simplistic attempts to define and reform the oppressive system we want destroyed.

The action wasn’t intended to be an attack on particular groups, or on the conference itself – it was meant to be a wake-up call to the
movement as a whole, to bring sexism to light and to provoke debate and action around how gendered power is imposed.

Where particular groups are represented in the film this is because their
visual material can be used to indicate wider sexism in the movement, not because they are more sexist than other groups.

The intervention was not carried out by pre-existing groups and should not be credited to particular individuals. Those who made it happen are
strongly committed to responding to and facing its consequences, but are acting in the knowledge that it could have been carried out by so many others. By those who followed them as they left the conference, by those who responded from movements outside of the UK, by those who emailed to say that they had faced sexism in the movement for years and never had the confidence to express it. It is being carried out by all those who have shown solidarity.


With those who want freedom from hierarchical systems, we should continue to meet, debate, fight, organise, write.

We call for critiques and improvements of our action. We call for a
queering of our text. We call for new texts.

Claim this action as your own. Change it, fuck with it, and keep fighting



  1. Why is it always considered ‘oppression’ or ‘objectification’ until it’s two lesbians on the cover of a magazine half-naked?

    Then people in the movement wonder why they get ‘labelled.’ Deceit and dishonesty will get you nowhere. When the people en mass wake up and realize what’s going on your own deception will be your downfall.

  2. sounds like people take jokes seriously…. since when did saying someone was hot constitute misogyny?

  3. Hi No Pretence, thank you for the activity, which I think is very necessary.
    Although, what I don’t understand is, given your analysis, why you seem to not be able to think outside the anarchist “movement”. Why do you / we need a “movement” at all? Can the fight against sexism, racism, anti-semitism be done within the bounderies of a “movement” or is it maybe the concept of the “movement” itself, which enforces the continous reproduction of the power and oppressive systems. By focusing on the “movement”, whatever the ideology, the struggle is already lost, before it starts.
    Therefore, I wish you good luck and especially the courage to leave the “movement”.

  4. Lol, u nutters.

    You should join the Judean People’s Front.


  5. If anyone is interested, this is being actively debated in this forum here:


    By a lot of anarchists; many feminist in perspective, sadly many anti-feminist as well.

  6. Hey.

    Yeah I’m male but I’m actively against all form of advantage systems, especially patriarchy. I was just wondering how this group originated and what your plans for the future are? I’m curious as I’m genuinely serious about this cause. My email is as given if you want to contact me through there or you can always comment back.

  7. […] Not The Final Word. No Pretence (2009-06-15) — responses to No Pretence’s anarcha-feminist intervention at l… […]

  8. “For any focus we put on the numerical dominance of men is only a detail within our broader perspective on the institutionalised power arrangements reproduced and upheld by patriarchy.”

    If you express a simplistic liberal analysis of gender relations then you can hardly be affronted when people assume that you have a simplistic liberal analysis.

    If you have a broader perspective on institutionalised power arrangements, why not state it?

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Archives